![]() The military of a player, who manages to claim the opponent's gold during an attack, gets stronger - even if the attack was barely successful. Overall the gold-based upgrading (Settlers 4) is better, but for me this is not due to the stealing: With the offensive bonus you get from gold (Settlers 3), risky attacks are encouraged and become very powerful. In theory, this is a very good idea.īut still, I see it the same way like you. ![]() The biggest one is that you are not dependent on a single ressource (gold) you either find or you don't, so you can always get better soldiers, at least in passive battles on your own soil. Rhineland: On the other hand the "spiritual upgrading" in Settlers 3 has advantages too.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |